Skip to main content

Relationships & How the internet is...

How would you finish this stem, "how the internet is..." ?


In The Atlantic's You Are Here (a series about the science behind everyday life) authors Alice Roth, Nicolas Pollock, Jackie Lay, Jeremy Raff, and Julie Beck provide some thoughts on "How the Internet is Changing Friendship"


Major Points Made:

  • Dunbar's Theory: Highest amount of people one can maintain meaningful relationships with is 100-200 depending on how social one is (many have lots more social media connections than that)
  • William Rawlings, a friendship researchers, divides friendships into 3 categories
    • Active - in contact and basically know what is going on in each other's lives
    • Dormant - shared history, and while not in contact could pick up where left off
    • Commemorative - a part of your history but not likely to be rekindled
  • The authors suggest commemorative friendships may enter a different zone due to social media, extending the lifespan of a friendship but perhaps it's like "life support" rather than keeping it truly alive
  • Emily Langton is referenced in regards to friendship maintenance and how social media allows convenient yet minimal maintenance to continue, though likely only sustains shallow friendships 
  • Social media, however, is a tool that can help you deepen your relationships when various social media are used in addition to in person contact
    • Media Multiplexity Theory
Some Comments on the Comments Section:
  • It is interesting to notice the comments on this video quickly turn into tawdry banter between viewers
  • Some viewers were requesting more science and that references be explicit in the description or at the end of the video, or criticizing the graph or lack of depth in explanation for given points
  • A hand full of comments were criticizing the way the narrator (Julie Beck) spoke; e.g. 1) "The vocal fry makes it hard for me to listen. Why are so many young women talking like this? Why isn't someone telling them that this is not a good communication style?" 2) "I gave up trying to understand this woman about halfway through; another example of the vogue for conversational mumbling. Women who talk like chipmunks can't expect to be taken seriously. Just because you can broadcast to the world doesn't make you a broadcaster..." among others
  • One wrote "Yeah, my policy is to read every comment like it's a joke." Another replied "Take every insult as a compliment; it pleases your friends and annoys your enemies."
  • Several viewers offered their anecdotal experiences on the subject, usually pointing to added complexity that was not explored in the video
  • A least one comment seemed to be in reference to a previous video, which speaks to a frustrating factor some speak about regarding auto-play features
  • Another comment seemed to be about something completely other than the video being commented on
This^ quick analysis was inspired when reading the comments and realizing once again an interesting dimension of Web 2.0 is the nature of communications via comments... It could be a whole topic of its own probably.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reflections & Excerpts

Finishing my degree with independent studies, satisfying remaining electives, was a great opportunity to apply and synthesize my learning throughout the Masters of Social Work (MSW) program. My proposed studies were both focused on the intersection of social work and new technology. In light of choosing the concentration in Policy/Planning, Administration, and Community (PAC) and my interests in new technologies and social media, I wanted to consider macro implications and innovations. Below are some excerpts from the cumulative paper I wrote for my independent studies. Introduction New technologies actively change the face of social work research, education, and practice. In fact, in the United States, there are few societal domains untouched by the information age and digital revolution, which is regularly redefined by emergent technologies. Social media and apps (which intertwine with the devices that animate them) are particularly disruptive innovations that both advance the fi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Technology Standards - NASW & ASWB

Reaching out to two social work groups for which I am a member on Facebook turned out to be very worthwhile. Even though it has only been 16 hours since posting, there has only been one comment made and not expecting to get much more! That's ok. Just the one person made a short comment that opened up a treasure trove of findings. For one, the National Association of Social Workers (NASW) in collaboration with other leading organizations in the field released an update to the  Standards for Technology in Social Work Practice on June 21, 2017 . It has been 12 years since the last edition was released, see  the 2005 version here  if you're interested in comparing. In between this time, the Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB) did have an international task force that released  Model Regulatory Standards for Technology and Social Work Practice in 2015 , I found this through  Social Work Today: Eye on Ethics . Second, the commenter made me aware of this^ and ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Attention Economy

Image found on  E-nvironmentalist Attention Economy ? I did "Google'd" it and found this thorough GitBook: Decentralised Attention Economies for Web 3.0 by Maciejolpinski  (updated two years ago) Tristan Harris has this to say: E-nvironmentalist  has two domains (natural & digital) and two authors (Alex Beattie & John Lang); it is definitely worth a look if you ask me. If only for the impressive user interface and well done integration of topics and gaphics. Check out these posts: HOW TO DISCONNECT IN THE ATTENTION ECONOMY: PART I & HOW TO DISCONNECT IN THE ATTENTION ECONOMY: PART II I believe it was Alex Beattie who created this useful google document with tools to assist marshalling one's attention  ...? I found the link via a FB group called "Friends of Time Well Spent"
Post a Comment
Read more